Legal Opinion
Brougher Agency, Inc. v. United Home Life Insurance
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 1, 1993No. 41A05-9301-CV-27PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Today we decide the scope of an arbitration panel’s authority and the effect of its award upon subsequent litigation. Appellant-defendants Underwriting Members of Lloyds of London, and Bruce Donald Shepherd and Lucy Jane Barker, Representative Underwriters of the Underwriting Members of Lloyds of London (collectively Lloyds), and Brougher Agency, Inc. appeal the trial court’s denial of their motions for summary judgment against United Home Life Insurance Co. (UHL), appellee-plain-tiff. Lloyds and Brougher contend the arbitration panel’s decision on two contract claims precludes…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Moore v. Sitzmark Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Schattner v. Girard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- City of Evansville v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DeFluiterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- National Wine & Spirits, Inc., National Wine & Spirits Corporation, NWS, Inc., NWS Michigan, Inc., and NWS, LLC v. Ernst & Young, LLPIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Nobles v. CartwrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bopp v. BramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Forrester v. Staggs (In Re Staggs)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- Staggs v. Forrester (In Re Staggs)District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.