Legal Opinion

Connecticut Indemnity Company v. Bowman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 1995No. 49A05-9412-CV-481PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARTEAU, Judge.

Connecticut Indemnity Company ("CIC") brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of CIC's motion to dismiss Eric Bowman's complaint against CIC raising the issue whether Bowman is collaterally es-topped from pursuing his claims for gross negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and constructive fraud. We affirm.

FACTS

Bowman was injured in the course of his employment with Standard Locknut and Lockwasher, Inc. ("Standard Locknut"). CIC is Standard Locknut's worker's compensation carrier and handled the adjustment and defense of Bowman's…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Peterson v. Culver Educational FoundationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Town of Flora v. Indiana Service Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Valley Federal Savings Bank v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. City of Lake Station v. State Ex Rel. Moore Real Estate, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. T.B. ex rel. BruceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Murphy Breeding Laboratory, Inc. v. West Central Conservancy DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Heald v. BlankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Schroeder v. Busick (In Re Busick)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001
  5. Connecticut Indemnity Company v. BowmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API