Legal Opinion

Intercontinental Fibres, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 9, 1976No. C.A.D. 1179; No. 76-7PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mareey, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs-Court, 75 Cust. Ct. 135, C.D. 4617, 406 F. Supp. 1221 (1975), denying-Intercontinental's claim for classification of certain imported polyester yarn within item 309.31, Tariff Schedules of the United States(TSUS), as “Grouped filaments” rather than as “Yarns * * *' With twist” under item 310.01. We affirm.

The imported polyester yarns had their genesis as extruded polyester-filaments. Those filaments became yarn when cooled, spin finished,* and wound in a bundle on a spool. At that point in the process, the *32yar…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Customs Brokg. Co., Inc., A/c Hamakua Mill Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Great Western Sugar Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  4. Intercontinental Fibres, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Siemens America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. Blakley Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  3. United States v. F.A.G. Bearings, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
  4. BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  5. ITT Thompson Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API