Legal Opinion
Raasch v. NCR Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 22, 2003No. C-3-02-272PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION (DOC. #7); TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, Chief Judge.
The question presented herein is whether an employer can enforce a mandatory arbitration policy imposed upon an at-will employee, where the employer had stated upon the initiation of the policy that the employee’s continued employment with the company, along with the acceptance of any future pay raises, promotions, bonuses, and the like, would constitute his acceptance of that policy.
Plaintiff Rex Raasch was employed by Defendant NCR Corporation (“NCR”) beginning in…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Tonya Cooper v. Mrm Investment Company, Terry Rogers and Larry MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Morrow v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.