Legal Opinion

Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 18, 1996No. 14562PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, as surety, and the defendants, as principals, executed a surety bond for the completion of subdivision improvements for the town of Monroe by the defendants. The plaintiff executed this bond in consideration for the defendants’ signing an indemnity agreement that provided in part that the defendants would indemnify the plaintiff “from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, attorney’s fees and expenses of whatever kind or nature which [the plaintiff] may sustain or incur by reason or in consequence of executing any such bond or bonds as surety. ...”

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MobleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  3. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. BardinelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Hyman v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
  3. FIRST INDEM. INS. CO. v. KemenashNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Fjk Associates v. Karkoski No. Spnh 9707-51408 (Oct. 10, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  5. Kearns v. Maresca, No. 301120 (Jul. 3, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API