Legal Opinion

Fjk Associates v. Karkoski No. Spnh 9707-51408 (Oct. 10, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 10, 1997No. SPNH 9707-51408Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION I

This a summary process action based on nonpayment of rent and lapse of time in connection with a residential tenancy. The court finds the allegations of the complaint proven by a fair preponderance of the evidence. However, the defendant has pleaded two special defenses.

II CT Page 10323

The defendant's first special defense alleges: "The premises contain numerous housing code violations."

"In the absence of a statute or covenant to the contrary, the lessor does not have a duty to keep in repair…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Doe v. MarselleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Lamb v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. State Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Edmundson v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API