Legal Opinion

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Bardinelli

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 12, 1995No. 14850PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant Laurance R. Bardinelli1 appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale following the granting of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. He claims that the trial court improperly granted the motion for summaiy judgment and, consequently, improperly rendered the subsequent foreclosure judgment because the notice of default did not comply with the mortgage deed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record discloses that on September 15,1989, the defendant executed a promissory note payable to the plaintiffs predecessor.2 This note was secured by a mortgage deed on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MobleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. LaValley v. CorreiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. BardinelliConnecticut Superior Court · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Karrlo K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Bank of America, FSB v. HanlonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Southeastern Connecticut Regional Resources Recovery Authority v. American Ref-Fuel Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. First Church of Christ v. Historic District CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API