Legal Opinion
Agyeman v. Bondi
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 17, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-0529Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERTA AGYEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-529 (JDB) PAMELA J. BONDI, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION After plaintiffs—154 family members or personal representatives of individuals murdered or injured in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks—obtained a default judgment against the Islamic Republic of Iran, they sought compensation from the Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism (“VSST”) Fund. Upon review of plaintiffs’ claims, the Special Master of the Fund determined plaintiffs were ineligible for payment,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.