Legal Opinion

Will v. Whitney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1860PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the La Orange Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit upon a note of the following tenor, to-wit:

“$469 tVo. “Piqua, November 30, 1857.
“ Six months after date we promise to pay Whipple and Gray, or order, at the Piqua branch harik of Ohio, four hundred and sixty-nine dollars and fro, for value received.
“ Will, Gable c& OoP

Indorsed, “ Whipple and GrayP

The suit is against Will, Gable, and Jones. } Gable and Jones appeared and answered. Concurrently with the commencement of the suit, a writ of attachment was obtained, which was levied upon property of Will.

Will appeared, first, simply to move to set aside the levy of the attachment. Afterward,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zehnor v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Carey v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SneghanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Rigsbee v. BowlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Midland Steel Co. v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Johnson v. Holt's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Hartlep v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API