Legal Opinion

Zehnor v. Beard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1856PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Beard sued Zehnor in the Court below to recover the balance due on a ^promissory note. Zehnor answered, setting up a failure of consideration. To the answer Beard filed a reply, composed of different paragraphs, and tendering several issues. Under the old practice it would have been regarded. as several replications. Zehnor moved the Court to rule the plaintiff to elect on which paragraph of the reply he would rest; and that the others be rejected. The motion was overruled, and exception taken.

At this point the record is confused, but not materially affe'cting the questions presented for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Train v. GridleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Preston v. Sandford's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Snodgrass v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. City of Evansville v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Campbell v. DutchIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API