Rigsbee v. Bowler
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Shelby Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Bowler sued Rignbee upon a promissory note made by the latter to one Carney, by whom it was indorsed to one Corey, who indorsed it to the plaintiff, Bowler.
The writ, in the cause, was made returnable on the second *168day of the next term succeeding its issue, and was served ten days before the first day of the term.
Had the writ been returnable in the Circuit Court, it would have been regular. Perk. Prac. 147. But the Common Pleas act of 1859, requires writs in that Court to -be returnable on the first day of a term. Acts 1859, p. 89.
The naming of a wrong day, in the right term, in the writ, was,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
- Will v. WhitneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Billingsley v. StrattonIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- White Water Valley Canal Co. v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
- Ziegenhager v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Briggs v. SneghanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- American Food Co. v. HalsteadIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- German-American Insurance v. YeagleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Durland v. PitcairnIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Burgett v. LoebIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.