State v. MacIas
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions of criminal sexual penetration of a child under the age of thirteen and criminal sexual contact. Defendant raises five issues on appeal. His first contention is that the district court erred in making the determination that the two children were incompetent to testify on the basis of interviews with a police officer that were videotaped shortly after one child reported the abuse to her mother. We agree. We vacate the judgment and remand for a proper competency determination. Because the result of the competency determination may not moot…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HargroveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. PostNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. FairweatherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. WhitfieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011