Legal Opinion
State v. Hargrove
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 9, 1970No. 367PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
Defendant was charged by indictment with performing “an indecent demonstration or exposure in the presence of-(name withheld), a female under the age of sixteen (16) years.” Section 40A-9-9, subd. B, N.M.S.A.1953. The cause was tried to a jury and defendant found guilty. This appeal is prosecuted from the judgment rendered upon the verdict. The evidence material to the charge was submitted only by the testimony of the prosecuting witness, and denied by the defendant.
We do not consider a statement of facts to be necessary for the reason that defendant’s only…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. BaileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. ArnwineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Mead v. O'CONNORNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. ClevengerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. HoldenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Gabrielson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
- Sandoval v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.