Legal Opinion

Hammerle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1985No. Appeal, No. 1373 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Thomas Hammerle appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed the referee’s denial of benefits. We must determine1 whether the board correctly concluded that Hammerle’s emotional disability was not caused by work-related stress, and therefore was not a compensable injury within the meaning of section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act,2 77 P.S. §411.

*488The claimant worked as an enforcement officer for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement. Within his assigned territory of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Moonblatt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. K-Mart Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Russella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Andracki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Antus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API