Hammerle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Thomas Hammerle appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed the referee’s denial of benefits. We must determine1 whether the board correctly concluded that Hammerle’s emotional disability was not caused by work-related stress, and therefore was not a compensable injury within the meaning of section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act,2 77 P.S. §411.
*488The claimant worked as an enforcement officer for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement. Within his assigned territory of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Moonblatt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- K-Mart Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by20 opinions
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Russella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Andracki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Antus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.