Legal Opinion

Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 2131 C.D. 1983 and 2037 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania appeals orders of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board in these two similar cases. Although not consolidated for argument, the cases present parallel elements prompting us to dispose of them in this consolidated opinion. In each case, the board affirmed the referee’s award of benefits for a psychiatric disability determined to be a compensable injury related to the claimants’ employment under section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act,1 77 P.S. §411. We must determine whether substantial evidence2 supports…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. University of Pittsburgh v. PerlmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Bevilacqua v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Russella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Andracki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. City of Scranton v. City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API