Legal Opinion

Moonblatt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1984No. Appeal, No. 2526 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Samuel Moonblatt (Claimant) seeks review of a decision by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed the decision of a referee who awarded Claimant disability benefits.

Claimant, an attorney, was employed by the City of Philadelphia (City) in varying capacities from 1975 through 1981. On April 28, 1981, Claimant was admitted to the Philadelphia Psychiatric Hospital where he remained until June 13, 1981, and continued to be treated as an outpatient thereafter. Claimant alleges that the pressures imposed upon him by his work for the City, and his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Elliot v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Berks County Home v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Antus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Hammerle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API