Legal Opinion
Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 1984No. Appeal, No. 2623 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Williams, Jr.,
Edmund Z. Hirsohberg (claimant) appeals from a Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board order which affirmed a referee’s denial of benefits because of claimant’s failure to prove he sustained a compensable injury under Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1
On March 3, 1980, claimant filed a claim petition against the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (employer or DOT) alleging he was totally disabled by stress resulting from his supervisors’ ha*581rassinent, intimidation and discriminatory treatment. From July 1978 until his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kitchen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Wynn v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by34 opinions
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Berardelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Russella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.