Robert v. Scarlata
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The pro se plaintiff, Paul Robert, appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding a lesser amount in damages on his trespass claim against the defendants, Carmen Scarlata and Wanda Bermudez, than was sought by the plaintiff. The defendants initially had pleaded a special defense of adverse possession but before the presentation of evidence, withdrew that defense and admitted that their conduct constituted a trespass. Accordingly, the sole issue determined by the court was the amount of damages sustained by the plaintiff. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stohlts v. GilkinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Right v. BreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Motherway v. GearyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Vincent v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Landry v. SpitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Newstone Development, LLC v. East Pacific, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
- Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. CunninghamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- In Energy Solutions, Inc. v. Realgy, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.