Legal Opinion

Robert v. Scarlata

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 13, 2006No. AC 26691PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

The pro se plaintiff, Paul Robert, appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding a lesser amount in damages on his trespass claim against the defendants, Carmen Scarlata and Wanda Bermudez, than was sought by the plaintiff. The defendants initially had pleaded a special defense of adverse possession but before the presentation of evidence, withdrew that defense and admitted that their conduct constituted a trespass. Accordingly, the sole issue determined by the court was the amount of damages sustained by the plaintiff. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stohlts v. GilkinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Right v. BreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Motherway v. GearyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Vincent v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Landry v. SpitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Newstone Development, LLC v. East Pacific, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  4. Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. CunninghamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. In Energy Solutions, Inc. v. Realgy, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API