Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Hudson

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 25, 1993No. Civ. A. 89-4185-SPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

In this case, plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for the Barnard State Bank of Barnard, Kansas, seeks to recover on a $245,000 promissory note which is now in default. On August 3, 1990, this court entered a default judgment against the debtor on the note, Universal Barge & Salvage Company (“UBS”). On January 15, 1991, the FDIC’s claims against the above-named defendants were tried to the court. Plaintiff seeks recovery of the principal balance and accrued interest on the promissory note from Thom Hudson under the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Nordstrom v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Sampson v. HuntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Citizens State Bank v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hein v. TechAmerica Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Caldwell-Baker Co. v. Southern Illinois Railcar Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  3. Adams v. WalkerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Citizens State Bank v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Opton, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API