Legal Opinion
Hein v. TechAmerica Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1994No. Nos. 92-3337, 92-3378PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal and cross-appeal each requires resolution of a single issue. On appeal, the issue is whether an employee’s interest in an employer’s salary continuation plan vested. The trial court concluded it was not and we affirm. On cross-appeal, the issue is whether the employer is entitled to recover benefits and salary paid the employee under the faithless servant doctrine. The trial court concluded it was not and we affirm.
A
The trial court’s findings of fact were not expressly appealed and we therefore regard the facts as found by the trial court to be undisputed.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Paul E. Black v. Tic Investment Corp. Stratton Georgoulis, Individually and James H. Slife, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- George Straub v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Sage v. Automation, Inc. Pension Plan & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Charlie McGee and Cross-Appellee v. Equicor-Equitable Hca Corporation, and Equicor Health Plan, Inc., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Thomas B. Healy, Jr. v. Rich Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Managed Care LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- United States v. Perez De DiosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- In Re the Colonial BancGroup, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010
- Miller v. Monumental Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Pony Computer, Inc. v. Equus Computer Systems of Missouri, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.