Legal Opinion

Nordstrom v. Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 19, 1980No. 50,101PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of real estate on the grounds of fraud and misrepresentation and to recover punitive damages. The defendants counter-sued to foreclose the purchase contract. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiffs. We affirm.

Carl and Cleo Nordstrom, plaintiffs, entered into a contract with John Lee and Marilee Miller, defendants, for the purchase of 480 acres of farm land located two miles west and ten miles north of Holcomb in Finney County. The land was described as follows: the Southeast…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Cinderella Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Newton v. Hornblower, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Wolf v. BrungardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Osgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. K-B Trucking Company and Keith Collins, Cross-Appellants v. Riss International Corporation and World Leasing, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. O'Gilvie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Anne P. Henry v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API