Legal Opinion
Jones v. Quintana
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 19, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2008-0620PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Alexandria Jones (“Jones”), a former employee of the District of Columbia’s Office of Unified Communications, brings this action against the District of Columbia (the “District”) and Janice Quintana (“Quintana”), the former Director of the Office of Unified Communications, who is now sued in this action solely in her personal capacity. Currently before the Court is Quintana’s [58] Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”), through which Quintana seeks the dismissal of Jones’ claim against her…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. QuintanaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021