Legal Opinion
Groseclose v. Great Northern Railway Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided March 8, 1960No. Civ. Nos. 2067-2069PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, all employees of the defendant, Great Northern Railway Company, seek in separate actions a determination of re-employment rights asserted under the provisions of the Universal Military Training Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 459. System Federation No. 101 of the Railway Employees’ Department, A.F.L.C.I.O., has filed motions for leave to intervene. Plaintiffs filed objections to the motions. Defendant has stipulated that they may be granted.
System Federation is an unincorporated association of local unions and acts as bargaining agent for its members with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co. v. Manning, Maxwell & Moore, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Kelley v. Summers Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Kelley (Two Cases). Kelley v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Pure Oil Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Usery v. BrandelDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- Zdanok v. GLIDDEN COMPANY, DURKEE FAMOUS FOODS DIV.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960