Legal Opinion
Pure Oil Co. v. Ross
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 17, 1948No. 9619PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, an Ohio corporation, filed its complaint against C. R. Ross, Lloyd Sloan, Estella K. Scott and others to have determined conflicting claims in the sum of $10,667.41, which plaintiff had in its possession and as to which adverse claims were asserted by defendants. The existence of the requisite jurisdictional amount, the diversity of citizenship of the adverse claimants, and the disinterestedness of plaintiff made the remedy of the Interpleader Act available to plaintiff. 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(26).
The amended complaint was filed on June 17, 1946 and the sum of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States Casualty Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Smith Petroleum Service, Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Company, Monsanto Chemical Company v. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Pan American Fire & Casualty Company v. RevereDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1960
- Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. Dean Construction Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.