Legal Opinion

United States v. Bickford

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 3, 1951No. C-2956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

I have for consideration the petitions of defendant Bickford, at present an inmate in the United States penitentiary at Leavenworth, (1) for release from alleged illegal imprisonment, to-wit, a sentence of 20 years imposed by Chief Judge Dave W. Ling of this District, on June 16, 1947; (2) for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum.

Defendant was indicted on two counts, Count One for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2311-2313, maximum penalty five years, Count Two for violation of the Lindbergh Kidnaping Law, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1201, maximum penalty life…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Livers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  3. Carignan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Tate v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BickfordDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1952
  2. Norvell M. Bickford v. C. H. Looney, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Norvell M. Bickford v. C. H. Looney, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Norvell Milbern Bickford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API