Norvell M. Bickford v. C. H. Looney, Warden

MURRAH

(concurring specially).

I concur in the disposition of this case solely on the ground that petitioner’s remedy under Section 2255, 28 U.S.C.A., asserted and fully litigated in United States v. Bickford, D.C., 96 F.Supp. 580, affirmed 9 Cir., 194 F.2d 1013, .was exclusive and dispositive of the relief petitioner seeks here. See Wright v. Looney, 10 Cir., 212 F.2d 186.