Legal Opinion
Eisfelder v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 16, 1993No. 5:92-cv-00073PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I
This action alleges employment discrimination beginning in 1989. Plaintiff is a longtime employee of the State of Michigan, who was assigned to the Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”) as a bookkeeper in 1984. In 1989, she took medical leave from her position for the purpose of surgery on her left leg. After returning to her job, she learned that her…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Mark Bledsoe v. Palm Beach County Soil and Water Conservation District, Board of County Commissioners for Palm Beach CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Niece v. FitznerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Dominguez v. City of Council Bluffs, IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
- Bledsoe v. Palm Beach Soil & Water Conservation DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.