Legal Opinion

Niece v. Fitzner

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 10, 1996No. Civil Action 94-CV-70718-DTPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BORMAN, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation submitted herein, and any all timely objections filed thereto. The Report and Recommendation is hereby accepted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims under, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act is DENIED. Extensive research has provided ample authority to support the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation concluding that Plaintiffs are not barred from bringing suit…

2Cases cited96 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tanney v. BolesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  2. Anderson v. Department of Public WelfareDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Nihiser v. Ohio Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. Henrietta D. v. GiulianiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  5. Thrope v. State of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API