Holden v. Schafer Bros. Lumber & Shingle Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover damages occasioned by the refusal of defendant to comply with the contract to furnish lumber to plaintiff for the purpose of manufacturing grain doors.
The complaint contained two causes of action. In the first cause of action it was alleged that on or about the 10th day of March, 1943, the parties entered into an oral contract, by the terms of which defendant promised and agreed to furnish to plaintiff certain lumber to be manufactured by defendant between the dates of the contract and January 1, 1944; that plaintiff agreed to pay and take…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- R. J. Menz Lumber Co. v. E. J. McNeeley & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Bogart v. Pitchless Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Federal Iron & Brass Bed Co. v. HockWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Warner v. Channell Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Bromley v. Heffernan Engine WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donald W. Lyle, Inc. v. Heidner & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954