Legal Opinion

Bromley v. Heffernan Engine Works

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1919No. 15241PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered September 23, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover damages for breach of a building contract. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs. The defendant interposed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial, both of which were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, and the defendant appeals.

The respondents are copartners doing business under the firm name of Hull Building Company. The *32appellant is a corporation with, its principal place of business in Seattle, Washington. During the month of May,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bogart v. Pitchless Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Cuschner v. Pittsburgh-Hickson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. M & R Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kadiak Fisheries Co. v. Murphy Diesel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API