Meade v. Watson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Stanislaus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to recover the sum of §280, *592with interest and counsel fees, and to foreclose- a lien for one half the value of a partition fence.
The appeal is from a judgment in favor of -defendant, on a demurrer to the complaint.
In addition to his general demurrer, defendant sets forth as special causes why the complaint is not sufficient, that the fence alleged to have been constructed by plaintiff is not one of the ■kinds of fence declared to be a lawful fence by the act of the legislature of the State of California, entitled “ an act concerning lawful fences,” approved April…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex parte BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Enright v. The S.F. & San Jose R.R.California Supreme Court · 1867
- Gonzales v. WassonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- People ex rel. Mills v. JobsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of Monrovia Evening PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. HirstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Dorman v. ErieMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Nevada School District v. ShoecraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Vallejo Ferry Co. v. Lang & McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911