Legal Opinion
People v. Hirst
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 1973No. Crim. 5323PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHELAN, Acting P. J.
Defendants James Anthony Hirst, Haven Colby Anshen and Veronique Else Madeleine Lettau have appealed from their convictions in a nonjury trial in the Municipal Court of the San Diego Judicial District for violations of Penal Code section 653g. That section as amended in 1970 reads: “Every person who loiters about any school or public place at or near which children attend or normally congregate is a vagrant, and is punishable by a fine of not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) or by imprisonment in the county jail for not exceeding six months, or by both such…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leonard James McSherry v. Sherman Block, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- People v. StrohlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Loska v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. Rudolfo A.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Reeves v. Rocklin Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.