Legal Opinion

Ex parte Burke

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1881No. 10,679PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus to Morrison, C. J.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrison, C. J.:

The return to the writ in this case shows that the petitioner is held under a commitment issued by Robert E. Warren, a Justice of the Peace of Butte County, on a judgment of conviction rendered on the 5th day of August, 1881, and that the offense, of which the petitioner was convicted, was that of “ keeping open a saloon on Sunday for the purpose of transacting business therein.”

The section of the Penal Code, under which the prosecution and conviction were had, reads as follows:

“ Every person who keeps open on Sunday any store, workshop, bar, saloon, banking-house, or other…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex parte NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Lindenmuller v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Hingle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. State v. AmbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cutting v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Smith v. McDermottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. SopherUtah Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Kirby v. Western Union Telegraph Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API