Legal Opinion

Armco Steel Corporation v. Stans

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 19, 1969No. 68 Civ. 4416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BONSAL, District Judge.

Armeo Steel Corporation (Armco) seeks a declaratory judgment holding unlawful and setting aside an order issued on November 19, 1968 (the Order) by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Zones Board) granting the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans (the New Orleans Board) the right to set up a foreign-trade sub-zone (sub-zone). Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U. S.C. § 2201 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331(a), 1337, and 1340.

Congress established the Zones Board in 1934 (Foreign Trade Zones Act, 48 Stat. 998 et seq., 19 U.S.C. §§ 81a et seq.), consisting of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armco Steel Corp. v. StansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. Arbor Foods Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  3. Armco Steel Corporation v. StansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API