Triano v. Massion
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Vice Chief Justice.
This is a direct appeal and cross-appeal pursuant to § 16-306, subsec. A, A.R.S. from an adverse decision challenging the filing of nomination petitions for the Tucson City Council.
We are called upon to answer three questions on appeal:
1. Is the one-year residency requirement of the Tucson City Charter for city council candidates constitutional?
2. If so, do the facts support the finding of the trial court that the defendant-appellant, Gary Lee Triano, was not a legal resident of Ward III for one year immediately prior to becoming a candidate ?
3. As to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Thompson v. MellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Gralike v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Draper v. PhelpsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1972
- Strode v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by15 opinions
- White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Castner v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Tucson v. Consumers for Retail ChoiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Jacobberger v. TerryNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Escamilla v. cuello/cabreraArizona Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.