Legal Opinion

Triano v. Massion

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1973No. 11306PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Vice Chief Justice.

This is a direct appeal and cross-appeal pursuant to § 16-306, subsec. A, A.R.S. from an adverse decision challenging the filing of nomination petitions for the Tucson City Council.

We are called upon to answer three questions on appeal:

1. Is the one-year residency requirement of the Tucson City Charter for city council candidates constitutional?

2. If so, do the facts support the finding of the trial court that the defendant-appellant, Gary Lee Triano, was not a legal resident of Ward III for one year immediately prior to becoming a candidate ?

3. As to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Thompson v. MellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Gralike v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Draper v. PhelpsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1972
  5. Strode v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Castner v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. City of Tucson v. Consumers for Retail ChoiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Jacobberger v. TerryNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Escamilla v. cuello/cabreraArizona Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API