Legal Opinion

Throneberry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 2002No. 2-01-079-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

Appellant Orvell Daniel Throneberry appeals his conviction and twenty-five-year sentence for felony evading arrest. Appellant asserts three points: (1) the trial court lacked jurisdiction to try the instant offense as a third degree felony under penal code section 38.04 because Appellant’s prior evading arrest conviction was not a “final conviction”; (2) the trial court erred in overruling Appellant’s motion for instructed verdict because there was insufficient evidence that the officer who arrested Appellant was “attempting a lawful arrest” as alleged in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Throneberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Cochran v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Ford, Edward E. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Kenneth Dwain Adkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API