Hall v. Otterson
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill, answer, replication and proofs in open court.
1Opinion of the Court
Green, Y. C.
Samuel Haines, late of the county of Burlington, in this-state, who departed this life about the year 1835, was seized in his lifetime and at his death of a considerable estate, including a farm at Moorestown, N. J., being the lands and premises in controversy in this suit. He left him surviving his widow, since-deceased, and two daughters, Rebecca B. and Sarah M., his only children and heirs-at-law. Sarah M. Haines, on or about the 9th of June, 1849, conveyed all her undivided one-half part in the premises in controversy to one John M. Kaighn, his heirs and assigns, in trust,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kane v. BloodgoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
- Boyd v. . De La MontagnieNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Smyley v. ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Dolliver v. DolliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Witbeck v. WitbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re FulperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1926
- In Re DodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Wolff v. WolffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Burger v. BurgerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Content v. DaltonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.