Legal Opinion

Lietchfield Manufacturing Co. v. Heinicke

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The defendant Heinicke was a farm implement merchant at Cresco. About May 1, 1920, he gave to appellee (plaintiff) a written order for 12 spreaders, to be shipped later. The order contained the following provision:

“Please ship specified goods to Frebert Heinicke for which undersigned agrees to pay at tlie prices and according to enumerated terms and conditions.”

It also contained provisions which are conceded to have made the contract one oí conditional sale, and by which the appellee retained the title “except as against retail sales” until full payment should be made in cash. The total price…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Carnall v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Pratt Paper Co. v. EifflerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Schramm & Schmieg Co. v. ShopeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. HerbransonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Andrew v. RiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Nokes v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API