Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Rivers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 15, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

— The evidence ranges over an extensive field, and we need not refer to it further than as it is relevant to appellant Van Vliet’s contentions that plaintiff should have brought his action within seven days after notice 0£ £he bulk sale under which Van Vliet got title, ° 7 and that plaintiff’s right to proceed under the Bulk Sales Law is “barred by limitation, acquiescence, waiver, laches, and estoppel.”

Rivers owned a lot and building, in which he kept a stock of merchandise and fixtures. He was owing Burton & Company State Bank $8,500. On November 21,1923, Rivers gave the bank (or its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dwight v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. McKeon v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Deariso v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. First National Bank of Albia v. White Ash Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Schramm & Schmieg Co. v. ShopeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernard Bell v. Harold Brown, Secretary, Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Evans v. HerbransonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Becker v. RolleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Bates v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Bernard Bell v. Harold Brown, Secretary, Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API