Legal Opinion

Schramm & Schmieg Co. v. Shope

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

On and prior to January 1, 1924, the plaintiff was the creditor of J. F. Shope, who was then engaged in the mercantile business at Sheridan, Iowa. On that date Shope sold his stock of goods in bulk to the defendant, Ward Shope, without complying with the formalities of the Bullí Sales Act. The plaintiff, as a creditor, was therefore entitled to treat the sale as void, and to proceed accordingly, unless he had in some manner estopped himself by waiver or acquiescence. The facts relied on by the defendant are that, though the plaintiff had received no advance notice of the proposed sale, it did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pratt Paper Co. v. EifflerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Evans v. HerbransonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Janvrin v. BroeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  3. Andrew v. RiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. People's Savings Bank v. McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Lietchfield Manufacturing Co. v. HeinickeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API