Legal Opinion
Home Insurance v. Paul
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 6, 1927No. 17882PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIEFENDAEFER, C.
This is an action on an automobile insurance poilcy, whereby plaintiff was insured upon an automobile against certain perils, among which were: “Theft, robbery, or pilferage, except by any person or persons in assured’s service or employment * * * and excepting also the wrongful conversion, embezzlement, or secretion by a mortgagor or vendee in possess’on under mortgage, conditional sale or lease agreement.”
The policy contained what was termed a “live'-'y and renting automobile indorsement” attached as follows:
“In consideration of an additional premium of $4.50, permission is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Merchants' Planters' Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Continental Ins. Co. v. ChanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Flohr v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. DonahueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gage v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co., of Hartford, Conn.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Indemnity Fire Corp. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Lineas Aereas Colombianas Expresas v. The Travelers Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Hawkins v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
- Simpson v. Palmetto Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- World Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.