Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Agricultural Insurance

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 3, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought on an insurance policy-issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, to recover for the loss of an automobile covered by the policy- and rented by the plaintiff to a customer and never returned. At the trial in the superior court a motion for a nonsuit was made by the defendant at the conclusion of the evidence for the plaintiff and was granted by the trial justice on the ground that it appeared from the evidence that no claim.for the loss was filed by the plaintiff with the defendant in accordance with the requirements of the policy. The case is now before…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bishop v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Searle v. Dwelling House InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Sergent v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Federal Insurance v. HiterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. Pilot Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  2. Toms v. Hartford Fire InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Foremost Insurance Company v. PitoccoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  4. Foremost Insurance Company v. Pitocco, 96-6460 (1999)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API