Flohr v. Territory of Oklahoma
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Woods County; before J. L. Pancoast, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Gillette, J.:
The appellants Charles Flohr and Emma Flohr were indicted at the February, 1903, term of the district court of Woods county, charged with the crime of grand larceny, and at the same term of said court the cause came on for trial, and the defendants were found guilty and 'sentenced, the said Emma Flohr for one year, and the said Charles Flohr for three years in the penitentiary.
Thirteen grounds of error are assigned by defendants in their motion for a new trial, the overruling of which is complained of in the petition of this court.
The indictment upon which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. LeyshonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. GossetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pyles v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. JosephWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. LongstrethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Bivens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.