State v. Britt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to grant his motion to dismiss. Defendant argues the State failed to put forth any evidence to show that he acted with fraudulent intent. After careful review, we agree.
In ruling upon a motion to dismiss, the trial judge must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and giving the State the benefit of every reasonable inference drawn from that evidence. State v. Smith, 40 N.C. App. 72, 252 S.E. 2d 535 (1979). The reviewing court must determine whether there is substantial evidence of each essential…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. . CohoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RupeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- North Carolina State Bar v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. AgustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.