State v. Newell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Defendant appeals from judgments entered upon jury verdicts finding him guilty of twenty-five counts of embezzlement. We conclude that the trial court erred when it peremptorily instructed the jury on the issue of intent. Accordingly, we grant defendant a new trial on all charges.
I. Background
Defendant owned and operated several businesses in Buncombe County. One of his businesses was called Interiors Marketplace. Through another of his businesses, Unity Marketing of Piedmont, Inc. ("Unity Marketing"), he contracted to lease retail space in Interiors Marketplace and serve as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Great American Insurance v. Storms (In Re Storms)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983
- Glover v. First Union National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. LouchheimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Freeman-White Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RenkosiakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022