Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 2004No. COA02-1582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant Daniel Delane Cook appeals from his conviction for embezzlement. He argues on appeal (1) that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence that he was at least 16 years old; and (2) that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of a prior incident of embezzlement by defendant. We hold that the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss, but that the admission of evidence of a prior incident of embezzlement was prejudicial error. Defendant is, therefore, entitled to a new trial.

Facts

The State’s evidence tended to show…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. National Food Stores v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Thigpen v. NgoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. RenfroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. RenfroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API