State v. Agustin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Where there was substantial evidence that defendant committed the offense charged after 1 December 2008, the trial court did not err in submitting the offense of rape of a child to the jury. Where the evidence as to the age of the defendant was uncontroverted, the trial court did not commit plain error in declining to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of first-degree rape. Where the statute was unambiguous, the trial court did not err in sentencing the defendant.
I. Factual and Procedural History
From about January 2010 through about April 2010, Amulfo Agustín…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ThomsenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. MarionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. FraleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- State v. HorneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
- State v. Lopez-PesinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.