Cimarron Village v. Washington
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge. *
Appellants Cynthia Washington and Clyde Penny challenge the district court’s grant of a writ of recovery. 1 Respondent Cimarron Village, which is federally subsidized under 26 U.S.C. § 42 (2002), sought to evict appellants due to numerous lease violations throughout their tenancy. The district court found that the lease violations, considered in their totality, provided Cimarron Village with good cause to terminate appellants’ tenancy. In challenging the grant of the writ of recovery, appellants argue that (1) the findings are insufficient to support an eviction…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Estate of JobeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Nash v. WollanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Chancellor Manor v. ThibodeauxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Oak Glen of Edina v. BrewingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Estate of LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational ChurchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Carter v. Maryland Management Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Doris A. Seward v. Taylor Florin-Clemants, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024