Legal Opinion

Carter v. Maryland Management Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 10, 2003No. 7, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

In Brown v. Housing Opportunities Comm., 350 Md. 570, 714 A.2d 197 (1998), we pointed out that the Real Property Article of the Maryland Code contains three separate and distinct provisions under which a landlord may recover possession of leased premises. Section 8-401 provides for the recovery of possession when the tenant fails to pay rent that is currently due and payable. Section 8-402 — often referred to as the “tenant holding over” statute — permits recovery upon a finding that the tenant’s lease has expired, that notice to quit was given, and that the tenant has refused…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Thelma Joy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Holland Daniels, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. State v. GhajariCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Navarro-Monzo v. Washington Adventist HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Edgewood Management Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Montgomery County v. Glenmont Hills Associates Privacy WorldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Indigo Real Estate Services, Inc. v. WadsworthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Yox v. Tru-Rol Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API