Legal Opinion

Chancellor Manor v. Thibodeaux

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 2001No. C7-00-1599PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORITSKY, Judge *

Appellant Patsy Thibodeaux was living in a Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-subsidized housing project owned by respondent Chancellor Manor. Chancellor Manor terminated Thibodeaux’s subsidy and lease agreement, alleging that she violated her lease agreement by failing to report income from two different jobs. Thibodeaux did not vacate the premises, and Chancellor Manor filed an unlawful detainer proceeding. The district court found that Thibodeaux had broken the terms of the rental agreement and ordered that a writ of restitution could issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer PressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Hazelton v. Commissioner of the Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cimarron Village v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Oak Glen of Edina v. BrewingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Manor v. GalesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API